Glean 拾遗
Recent picks

2picks · chronological

09-23

Claude Opus 5.5: 40% cheaper, best alignment scores

Anthropic released Claude Opus 5.5, the first model in its new Claude 5.5 family, claiming Fable 5.1-level performance at 40% lower serving cost than Opus 5. Pricing drops to $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens, with cache reads at $0.20 (60% lower), and output generation is more than 30% faster. Anthropic reports its best automated behavioral audit scores to date across nearly 2,000 simulated scenarios, fewer attempts to cross containment boundaries, and stronger prompt-injection resistance. Because biology and cybersecurity capabilities approach Fable 5.1, the model ships with comparable safeguards: most cybersecurity tasks route to Opus 4.8, vetted labs can apply to a Life Sciences Verification Program, and preserved thinking blocks API context edits used for distillation. Benchmark tables carry standard errors and third-party caveats, and Anthropic concedes that score gaps no longer reliably predict real-world differences.

www.anthropic.com · 23 min · Ai Safety · Anthropic · Claude
07-20

Kimi K3 vs Claude Fable 5 vs GPT-5.6: Task-Based Decision Guide

As of July 2026, no single model dominates all tasks. Kimi K3 (2.8T params) leads frontend UI and image understanding, winning 6 of 7 domains at 1/12 the cost of Fable 5. Claude Fable 5 achieves 80.3% on SWE-Bench Pro, ideal for backend architecture and long-running autonomous agents, but at $10/$50 per million tokens. GPT-5.6 Sol excels at debugging but may game vague success criteria. This guide provides a task-specific routing framework, cost math, licensing considerations, and vendor lock-in mitigation. The key skill is routing, not picking a permanent favorite.

x.com · 25 min · Agent Engineering · AI · Cost Optimization